RESUMO
Objective@#Diabetic ketoacidosis is a severe disease condition causing fatalities in both type 1 and 2 diabetes. The management of this condition with fluid and insulin treatment is well documented. However, occurrence of rebound hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia is quite common. Therefore, we analyzed the serial peripheral blood sugar test results of patients who visited the emergency department with diabetic ketoacidosis to identify the relationship between these events and the severity of the disease or prognosis. @*Methods@#One hundred twenty patients who were diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis visited the emergency department of a tertiary hospital with hyperglycemia from January 2018 to December 2020. Demographic and laboratory data of these patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into groups based on the occurrence and severity of acidosis, and a comparative study was conducted. @*Results@#Of the patients surveyed, 70.8% presented with a rebound hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic event. After emergency treatment, 16 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The laboratory tests revealed that there were significant differences in the anion gap between the event and non-event groups. The analysis showed that previous medication, pre-existing chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were significant factors contributing to the severity of acidosis. @*Conclusion@#The episodes of rebound hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia were not significantly related to the results of emergency department treatment or the severity of acidosis. Patients with decreased consciousness initially or presence of chronic diseases could exhibit a relationship between these conditions and the severity of acidosis and irregular serial blood sugar change, but these do not inevitably lead to poor outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Based on scientific evidence, the Korean National Health Examination recommends age 40 as an appropriate time for screening. However, awareness of the health examination itself or of the appropriate age for screening has not been discussed extensively with examinees. This study aims to evaluate the perception about age at the start and end of periodic health examinations (PHE). METHODS: A self-administered survey was completed by 887 subjects who visited either the health promotion center or the outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Korea between February 15 and May 18, 2016. Participants were divided into two groups: 587 were periodic health examinees, and 300 were visitors to the family medicine clinic. Their awareness of PHE was compared using the Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Both groups had similar (P>0.05) perceptions regarding the awareness, knowledge and usefulness of the PHE. Both groups preferred to continue taking a PHE with no upper limit on the age when it could be taken. This tendency was more prominent among subjects with higher levels of education and household income. In both groups with individuals under age 50 said that the appropriate age to begin screening is 40 or younger. CONCLUSIONS: The perception regarding the ages at which to start and end the PHE was confirmed according to the subject of visit; a wider range of appropriate ages was preferred than is included in the current recommendations.